Il y a toujours un chemin.

HumanFrench

Un français patient, bienveillant et humain.

LE LABO · I forget · Nº 2

Re-reading and highlighting? Stop — test yourself instead

By Débonnaire · 3 min read

The problem

You open your vocabulary notebook. You read the list again. You highlight the important words in yellow. You read it once more. Everything feels familiar, so you assume it’s known. Three days later, mid-sentence, the word doesn’t come.

Familiarity is not memory. Re-reading creates the first; only recall creates the second.

What the research found

In 2013, five researchers put ten study techniques that students actually use under the microscope, weighing hundreds of experiments for each (Dunlosky et al., 2013). They gave each one a utility rating: low, moderate or high.

The two most popular techniques — re-reading and highlighting — get the “low” rating. They aren’t harmful; they simply pay off little, and they give a sense of mastery that doesn’t match what will remain.

Only two techniques are rated “high”: testing yourself (retrieval practice) and spacing your reviews. Testing yourself means trying to produce the answer from memory before looking at it. A word, a rule, a sentence. The mere act of searching strengthens the trace, even if you don’t find it straight away.

The gap between what learners do and what works is real: when students are asked how they study, the majority name re-reading and very few name self-testing (Karpicke, Butler & Roediger, 2009). It isn’t a lack of seriousness. It’s that re-reading feels good in the moment, and self-testing stings a little. The feeling doesn’t tell the truth.

Do this today

Take the list you were about to re-read. Cover the French column. For each word, say the answer out loud, or write it, before you lift your hand. Note the ones you missed. Repeat only those.

It takes the same time as three re-reads, and it doesn’t feel the same: more effort, less comfort. That effort is the signal that it’s working.

How our lessons use it

In “Je m’appelle Nadia” the order is deliberate: you read the story once, hide it, recall three details from memory, and only then check. The last step, “Dis-le à ta façon”, has you produce your own sentences rather than copy. Recall always comes before re-reading — that’s the rule in all our lessons.

Try it in Je m’appelle Nadia (A1): answer the three questions without looking at the text. You may get some wrong. Good.

The honest limit

Self-testing makes what you understood stick. If the story is too hard for you to understand anything on the first listen, recall has nothing to grab — pick one level down. And re-reading keeps a place: the first time, to understand. It’s the fifth re-read that no longer does anything.

Your questions

So re-reading is useless?

Re-reading once to understand, no. Re-reading five times to remember, yes: after the second pass the gain is almost nil and the feeling of mastery is misleading.

I have nobody to quiz me. How do I test myself alone?

Cover the page and write what you remember. Or read the PDF questions before the story and answer from memory afterwards. A test doesn't need a grade to work.

Doesn't getting it wrong while testing myself lock in the mistake?

Not as long as you check right after. A wrong answer followed by a correction is remembered better than a right answer merely re-read.

References

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266

Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?. Memory, 17(4), 471–479. doi:10.1080/09658210802647009

Try the free lessonRecorded coursesComing soonNext article →

You may also like