I hesitate on multiple-choice questions: practise in the real format, and check the corrections every time

The problem

Question 14. You have read the passage, you understood the idea. Four options. B looks right. So does C, give or take a nuance. You reread both, you feel the clock, you tick B, then change it to C, then go back to B. At home, though, you understood everything. You had reread your notes three times. It is not your French that is wobbling: you have done a lot of recognising and very little choosing.

What the research found

Jeffrey Karpicke and Janell Blunt (Karpicke & Blunt, 2011) had 80 students read a science text, in four groups. The first read it once. The second reread it several times. The third built a concept map with the text open, a method with a reputation for being “deep”. The fourth closed the text and wrote down everything they could remember, then reread and did it again. A week later, everyone sat the same test. The group that had tested itself scored a proportion correct of 0.67, against 0.45 for the concept-mapping group and 0.49 for those who had reread. Testing beat every other method, including on questions that required linking ideas together.

A few years earlier, Henry Roediger and Jeffrey Karpicke (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006) had seen the same thing with short passages: after a week, tested students recalled 56% of the ideas, against 42% for those who had reread. And here is the sting: the rereaders were more confident. Rereading makes you sure of yourself; testing makes you able.

The mechanism in plain words: when you reread, the information is in front of you and your brain recognises it, which is easy and reassuring. When you test yourself, you have to retrieve it unaided, and that effort strengthens the path that leads to it. A multiple-choice question is exactly that kind of task: retrieve, then decide between options that look alike. If you have never decided in practice, you decide for the first time on exam day.

Do this today

Take ten questions from a sample paper, in the real format, with the real timer. Answer with no help at all, ticking one option even when you hesitate. Then open the answer key and, for every mistake, write one sentence on why the right answer is right and why yours was not. Five minutes is enough. That moment of correction is where the test turns into learning.

How our lessons use it

The reading activity « Je m’appelle Nadia » (A1) follows this principle to the letter. You read a short story, then hide it. You try to recall three details: her name, her city, what she likes doing on Saturdays. Then you check against the text and see exactly what was missing. After that, “Dis-le à ta façon” asks you for three sentences about yourself. Testing first and checking second is the same move as in the exam, only gentler. Start with Je m’appelle Nadia (A1).

The honest limit

Both studies involved American students learning texts in English, their first language, not TCF or TEF candidates. The results are group averages over one week, not individual predictions. They show that self-testing strengthens memory for content; they do not say that ten questions a day is enough to move up a level.

Your questions